An interesting narrative has recently surfaced from Indian channel NewsX, often aligned with the BJP’s ecosystem, attempting to frame Pakistan’s engagement with US lobbying firms during the Trump administration as a nefarious plot. However, this thinly veiled accusation appears to be less about genuine journalistic inquiry and more about a calculated maneuver in India’s own ongoing, multifaceted influence operations. This critical stance against foreign lobbying inadvertently shines a light on India’s deep-seated discomfort with Pakistan’s diplomatic maneuvering and, more pointedly, its own extensive and often opaque lobbying machinery in Washington, D.C. The intent is clear: to stir controversy, malign Pakistan, and peddle conspiracy-laden nationalism, all while deflecting attention from its global lobbying nexus.
Corporate Clout: India’s True Influence Game
The irony of NewsX’s accusations is stark. Far from being a victim of foreign lobbying, India has actively cultivated a powerful network of influence in the United States. Major Indian conglomerates like Adani and Tata are known to engage high-profile US law and lobbying firms, many registered under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA). These engagements aren’t just for legitimate business interests; they extend to influencing policy, regulatory decisions, and crucially, shaping narratives that align with India’s strategic agenda, including those that are anti-Pakistan. For instance, Adani Group representatives reportedly lobbied Trump-era officials concerning significant legal and regulatory challenges, including a substantial bribery and fraud case. Such instances highlight how corporate financial power is deployed to navigate, and potentially manipulate, legal and policy frameworks in Washington, directly contradicting the very allegations its media outlets levy against others.
Extensive Indian Lobbying Footprint and Covert Operations
India’s US lobbying is extensive. In 2005, it paid BGR Group $240,000 for nuclear deal discussions. From 2006-2012, BGR received $180,000 quarterly, totaling nearly $5 million by 2013. NASSCOM annually spent $350,000-$700,000 on tech/immigration policy lobbying. Indian lobbying consistently targeted defense, trade, US visa laws, and neutralizing Pakistan on Kashmir. Its ecosystem thrives on opacity, using diaspora networks, think tanks, and shell entities to mask state-led influence. Embassies coordinate with media to manipulate narratives on Kashmir, CAA-NRC, and farmer protests. India weaponizes soft power like Bollywood and yoga as cover for aggressive maneuvering. Global PR firms like APCO Worldwide polish India’s image and muffle human rights criticism. In the UK, diaspora groups sanitize Kashmir actions and discredit pro-Kashmir voices.
The Arrogance of Indian Strategic Mindset
The belief that lobbying firms can effortlessly sway the White House or dictate US foreign policy exposes a profound immaturity in New Delhi’s understanding of how global power genuinely operates. This level of arrogance in its foreign policies is a direct product of the BJP-driven make-believe rise of India to global status. It foreshadows India’s potential attitude towards existing world powers should it ever gain substantial influence, expecting others to conform to its desires and preferences. Such accusations also reveal the amateur thinking of India’s stratcom handlers, who confuse paid PR and diaspora noise for real diplomacy, underscoring a delusion that fails to grasp the complexities of geopolitical engagement with a nation like Pakistan.
Conclusion: A Broader Game of Influence
Ultimately, while accusing others of lobbying, India actively employs various tools of influence to advance its agenda on the global stage. This highlights a strategic double standard, where legitimate diplomatic efforts by other nations are demonized, while India’s own extensive influence operations remain largely unexamined by its domestic media. As India seeks a greater global role, its actions underscore a readiness to employ all tools of influence, including those it hypocritically decries when attributed to others. This continuous narrative manipulation attempts to shape international perception and maintain a domestic sense of victimhood, diverting attention from its own pervasive influence operations.
Also Read: From Chest-Thumping to Checkmate: How Modi’s Propaganda Is Pushing India Into Global Isolation
