ISLAMABAD: Barrister Saad Rasool has come under sharp criticism for filing an adjournment application in the Federal Constitutional Court, reportedly seeking extra time under false pretences. Observers note that on the same day he appeared in the Supreme Court for another case concerning Suhrab Barkat’s bail, raising questions about the credibility of his earlier request.
Allegations of professional misconduct
Legal commentators argue that deliberately misleading a court undermines not only the individual lawyer’s reputation but also the integrity of the judicial system. By claiming the need for adjournment and then attending another proceeding on the same day, Barrister Rasool’s actions are viewed as a violation of professional ethics. Experts say such behaviour erodes public trust in legal practitioners and calls into question adherence to established codes of conduct.
Calls for accountability
Senior lawyers and legal analysts emphasise that intentional misrepresentation before a court warrants strict disciplinary measures. Observers have suggested that immediate suspension of the lawyer’s licence may be necessary to safeguard the prestige and authority of the judiciary. The case highlights the critical importance of ethical standards and transparency in maintaining confidence in the legal system.
